Home > Travel as a Political Act > Blog

In Iran, I was keenly aware that I was traveling in a society where morality is legislated — where a crime is a sin, and a sin is a crime. In their day-to-day lives, the women of Iran are keenly aware of the impact of living in a theocracy. The days when the Shah's men boasted that miniskirts were shorter in Tehran than they were in Paris are clearly long gone. In the post-Islamic Revolution Iran, modesty rules, and the dress and behavior of women are carefully controlled.

While things are casual at home, Iranian women are expected not to show their hair or the shape of their body in public. This means that, when out and about, a proper woman covers everything except her face and hands. There are two key components to traditional dress: Hijab (“hih-JOB”) means to be dressed modestly, with the head covered under a scarf. The chador (“shah-DORE”) is a head-to-toe black cloak wrapped around the front and over the head. All women must follow hijab rules, and many older, rural, and traditional women choose to wear a chador.

In addition to the dress code, Iranian women face other limitations. They're relegated to separate classrooms and sections in mosques. While they are welcome at more genteel sports, they are not allowed to attend soccer games (for fear that they might overhear some foul language from the impassioned fans). On the subway, women have two options: Ride with men in the mixed cars, or in a separate, women-only car. (When I questioned an Iranian woman about this, she said, “Perhaps the women of New York wished they had a car only for them to avoid the men on their subway trains.”)

From a Western viewpoint, it's disrespectful (at best) to impose these regulations on women. But from a strict Muslim perspective, it's the opposite: Mandated modesty is a sign of great respect. In the Islamic Republic of Iran, women's bodies are not vehicles for advertising. Having scantily clad babes selling cars at a trade show would be considered unacceptably disrespectful. You don't see sexy magazines. There is almost no public display of affection. In theory, the dress code provides a public “uniform,” allowing men and women to work together without the distractions of sex and flirtation.

Still not buying it? You're not the only one. Local surveys indicate that about 70 percent of these women would dress more freely in public, if allowed. Many push the established bounds of decency — with belts defining the shape of their bodies and scarves pulled back to show voluptuous cascades of hair — when out on the streets. When filming, I found the women's awareness of our camera fascinating — they seemed to sense when it was near, and would adjust their scarves to be sure their hair was properly covered.

In spite of attempts to enforce modesty, vanity is not out of bounds. Women still utilize their feminine charms. In a land where showing any cleavage in public is essentially against the law, a tuft of hair above the forehead becomes the exciting place a man's eye tends to seek out. Cosmetic surgery — especially nose jobs — is big business here among the middle class. Faces are beautifully made up, and — when so much else is covered — can be particularly expressive and mysterious. Throughout Iran, I was impressed by the eye contact.

Trying to grasp Iran's mandated modesty in Christian terms, I imagined living in a society where every woman is forced to dress like a nun. Seeing spunky young Muslim women chafing at their modesty requirements, I kept humming, “How do you solve a problem like Maria?”

About This Entry

You are reading "Imagine Every Woman's a Nun", an entry posted on 26 March 2010 by Rick Steves.

5 replies to this entry. Add your comment below.


Comments  [ top ]

Can't imagine any advanced culture squandering the intelligence of 35,000,000 female citizens. Perhaps Iranian women operate effectively behind the scenes to influence govt. the sciences, arts.

Posted by: Bill Kester - Mar 26, 2010 12:00 PM
I think women can be very intelligent, empowered, and treated equally in economics, civil rights, and marriage while dressing modestly. The much more important issues for women in all societies is the ability to leave their homes without a male relative escorting them, being punished for bringing dishonor on their family if they are raped, being able to drive a vehicle, being able to work outside of the home, and being able to use birth control.

Posted by: bill - Mar 26, 2010 12:25 PM
Rick As you always say we leave home to enjoy the differences in our travels. I sense a non-approving tone in this post. Is it not each culture's differences that make them unique, special and interesting?

Posted by: dkh - Mar 27, 2010 3:51 PM
All things are difficult before they are easy. <a href="http://www.vivisupermall.com/">Wholesale Jordans Shoes</a> <a href="http://www.vivisupermall.com/">Wholesale Jordans</a> <a href="http://www.vivisupermall.com/">Wholesale Handbags</a> <a href="http://www.vivisupermall.com/">Wholesale Clothing</a> http://www.vivisupermall.com/

Posted by: wholesale jordans shoes - Aug 03, 2012 11:08 PM
Rehmat the story of manipulation of US pseinon funds by zionist organizations, including UJF, has not been told boldly enough. Once again using Iran as the boogey man, zionist organizations embarked on a nationwide campaign to induce state employees' and teachers pseinon funds to divest from shares in international companies doing business with Iran, EVEN WHEN and EVEN THO those positions formed the safest and surest portion of the pseinon funds' portfolio.California was the first state to so dives and was used as a model by UJF. Today, California's pseinon fund is bankrupt. Cause and effect relationship? That would be unfair to assert. But it certainly didn't help California's pseinonersand pseinon fund managers to have to navigate around threats of financial punishment from zionists AS WELL AS the normal difficulties of maintaining a massive portfolio.Similarly, when the US economy is in deep trouble, why has the US Treasury created an office, directed by Stuart Levey, to go around the world threatening and strong-arming companies that do business with Iran, exacting fines from them for transacting with Iran? Doesn't the US Treasury Dept have enough to do to keep the US fiscal house in order?

Posted by: Itink - Aug 27, 2012 11:35 PM

Post a Comment  [ top ]
Name

Email (optional)

Before adding your comment, please read our Posting Guidelines.

Comments

Bold | Italic | Quote | Paragraph

Characters left:
Input the word in the image to verify you're a human and not a spammer.